Close window | View original article
The first article in this series pointed out the absurd ways our ruling elites bend over backward to pretend that all racial groups are identical in every way. The TSA is being criticized for screening passengers and focusing more on those who're more likely to commit acts of terrorism. To our elites' shock and horror, this focused on more Middle Easterners than on others.
The TSA may have to give up "racial profiling." As a politically-correct TSA spokesman put it, "Profiling is not only discriminatory, but it is also an ineffective way to identify someone intent on doing harm." Ineffective? When just about all international terrorists are of a specific ancestry?
The New York police instituted a policy of sending officers disproportionately to high-crime neighborhoods where they interact with citizens to remind them that the police are watching. Blacks and Hispanics account for 98% of the gun assaults in New York City and most of their victims are black or Hispanic, so this policy sends police disproportionately to minority neighborhoods. Crime dropped substantially in New York, partly due to sending police to high-crime areas.
The usual groups are complaining that the police are interacting with more minorities than whites even though it's obvious that non-white individuals are far more likely to commit crimes than whites are.
For all this sound and fury about the evils of racism and the futility of allocating police resources based on who's most likely to commit a crime, there's one area where our ruling elites have no trouble at all with racism - when it's directed against whites.
The New York Times responded to the attack in the Sikh temple by claiming that hate crimes are under-reported:
Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. told the Senate in 2009 that “we have a significant hate crimes problem in this country.” The recent murders at the Sikh temple in Wisconsin have raised this issue in the public consciousness.
The Times is worried that a lot of hate crimes are prosecuted as if they were ordinary crimes and don't show up in the statistics. The Times ignores the fact that a significant number of hate crimes are fakes. They argue that we need to find more hate crimes to punish, specifically hate crimes committed by white people.
The shooting rampage on Sunday that killed six people and wounded three others at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin exposed the continued dangers of white power extremism in our midst. The shooter, Wade M. Page, was affiliated with a range of neo-Nazi skinhead groups, and during the last decade, he played in several prominent bands in the white power music scene.
The Times would have us believe that thousands of neo-Nazis thrive in the "white power" music scene, downloading Aryan music and chatting online about offenses committed by non-whites.
Law enforcement and anti-racist activists should pay close attention to the scene as a motivating force for hate crime because when extremist ideas endure, so does the potential for extremist actions.
The Times believes that police should pay disproportionate attention to white groups which sing certain Aryan songs because of the "potential for extremist actions."
Has the Times never heard of rap? These lyrics are by "artists" who've won Grammy awards, the music industry's highest honor.
“Kill the white people; we gonna make them hurt; kill the white people; but buy my record first; ha, ha, ha”
“Kill d’White People”; Apache, Apache Ain’t Shit, 1993, Tommy Boy Music, Time Warner, USA.
“I kill a devil right now … I say kill whitey all nightey long … I stabbed a fucking Jew with a steeple … I would kill a cracker for nothing, just for the fuck of it … Menace Clan kill a cracker; jack ‘em even quicker … catch that devil slipping; blow his fucking brains out”
“Fuck a Record Deal”; Menace Clan, Da Hood, 1995, Rap-A-Lot Records, Noo Trybe Records, subsidiaries of Thorn EMI; called The EMI Group since 1997, United Kingdom.
It doesn't take much googling to find a great many "hate songs" urging black people to commit violence against whites. The Times assumes the tiny handful of white people who sing songs about murdering non-whites will commit murder and therefore ought to be watched. The Times' own statistics say that the average black person is 20 times more likely to commit a violent crime than a white person. Why not watch black people who sing songs about black people murdering whites, particularly when there are so many more of them and, unlike totally obscure white-power music, violent rap songs are blasted across the public airwaves from coast to coast?
If the Times were serious about monitoring singing groups to forestall violence, they'd look at black groups who sing about murdering whites.
The Wall Street Journal reports that the black murder rate is increasing even though overall crime rates are dropping.
More than half the nation's homicide victims are African-American, though blacks make up only 13% of the population. Of those black murder victims, 85% were men, mostly young men.
An average black is more than 4 times more likely to be murdered than a white. The article reports that 6% of black murder victims are killed by whites whereas 14% of white murder victims are killed by blacks. Blacks kill twice the fraction of white murder victims as whites kill black murder victims; if the writers of white-power music are trying to incite whites to violence against blacks, they're nothing like as successful as rap artists doing the same thing in reverse.
The fascinating thing about the victims of black crime, which we're not allowed to talk about, is how many of them are black.
If you're murdered, do you really care whether it was a black or a white who did you in? If you live in a crime-infested neighborhood, wouldn't you want a heavy police presence to try to clear the streets of thugs regardless of race?
In fact, if the Times cared about poor blacks, they should be the loudest advocates of a heavy police presence in black neighborhoods to protect the law-abiding black majority from the minority of black thugs who prey on them. After all, aren't poor black people citizens with the same right to police protection as their fellow citizens who happen to be rich, white, or both?
By condemning police attempts to arrest black criminals, the Times is encouraging criminal violence against innocent blacks. Isn't that just as racist as the KKK, which also endorses criminal violence against innocent blacks? Apparently, that sort of racism is OK.
In New York City as in music, the black community is where you'll find the largest percentage of violent crimes. Attempts to stop those crimes can't help but emphasize investigation into the preponderance of black criminals who commit them. That would be racism, however, so we can't do that.
Closely monitoring whites, however, who commit a minute fraction of the crimes by percentage, would be sound law enforcement. Just ask the Times.